![]()
2008-2009 Academic
Senate Academic Affairs Committee
Issues Pending
(Link to List of Internal Committee Members of the
Academic Senate)
![]()
|
Document Number |
Subject |
Status |
Remove From Committee
List? |
Committee to Complete
By: |
|
|
NA |
Academic Planning
Committee Member Selection |
Pending Annually/Completed
for 2008-2009 |
|
|
|
|
ANNUALLY: Chairperson of the Academic Affairs
Committee to annually select one Academic Affairs Committee Faculty Member
to serve on the Academic Planning Committee. |
|||||
|
NA |
Academic Plan |
Pending Annually |
|
|
|
|
ANNUALLY: Academic
Plan to be presented to the Academic Senate as an Advisory Item annually. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
NA |
UCC Annual Report |
Pending Annually |
|
|
|
|
An annual report on the
general activities of University Curriculum Committee was first requested by
Senate Chairperson Lane Crothers in October 2005. Report is to be forwarded
annually to the Academic Affairs Committee as an advisory item. |
|||||
|
04.28.08.01 |
University Curriculum Committee Annual Report |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
From Carlyn
Morenus, 2007-08 University Curriculum Committee Chairperson: University
Curriculum Committee Annual Report. Report not distributed to Executive
Committee as it was received just prior to the Executive Committee’s final
meeting (04/28/09) of the academic year. Report to be distributed to the 2008-09
Academic Affairs Committee. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
01.20.06.02 |
Winter Break
Interim Courses |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
Per the Senate Executive Committee discussion of 2/27/06,
the Academic Affairs Committee should consider the feasibility of, and
interest in, and offerings of interim classes during winter breaks. Update: No
action on this item was reported by committee during 2007-08 academic year. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
10.16.06.01 |
Student
Recruitment and Retention: Native American Student Recruitment and Retention
Issues |
Follow Up
Required? |
|
|
Distributed to
Senate as Reference Document for Presentation on 1/23/08 |
|
From Susan
Kalter, Administrative Affairs Committee Chairperson: E-mail communication
regarding concerns about Native American recruitment and retention. The
Executive Committee referred the issue to the 2006-07Academic Affairs
Committee on 10/30/06. |
|||||
|
12.18.07.01 |
Student
Recruitment and Retention: Native American Student Issues and Recommendations |
Follow Up
Required? |
|
|
Distributed to
Senate as Reference Document for Presentation on 1/23/08 |
|
From Susan Kalter, 2007-08 Senate Executive Committee
Member: Recommendations for improving Native-American student experience at
ISU. Briefly discussed by the Senate Executive Committee on 1/14/08.
Referred to 2007-08 Academic Affairs Committee. |
|||||
|
01.15.08.01 |
Student
Recruitment and Retention Presentation -Document 1: Changing Demographics of
Higher Education Students – Slide
Presentation Excerpts from Jon Rosenthal |
Follow Up
Required? |
|
|
Distributed to Senate
for Presentation on 1/23/08 |
|
01.23.08.01 |
Student
Recruitment and Retention Presentation -Document 2: Programs Supporting the
Recruitment and Retention of Students from Underrepresented Groups
Presentation Document from Jon Rosenthal |
Follow Up
Required? |
|
|
Distributed to Senate
for Presentation on 1/23/08 |
|
NA |
Student
Recruitment and Retention Presentation: Native American Student Recruitment
Issues Presented by Ann Haugo |
Follow Up
Required? |
|
|
Senate
Presentation on 1/23/08 |
|
During the
committee reports at the Senate meeting of 11/7/07, Frank Waterstraat,
2007-08 Academic Affairs Committee Chairperson, recommended that Jon
Rosenthal, Office of Enrollment Management and Academic Services, and his
team, which included Molly Arnold and Shane McCreary, present information to
the Senate about Native American student recruitment and other student
recruitment and retention issues. |
|||||
|
On 1/23/08, Jon
Rosenthal, Enrollment Management and Academic Services, gave a presentation
to the Academic Senate on “The Changing Demographics of Higher
Education Students” and “Programs Supporting the Recruitment and Retention
of Underrepresented Students”.
Additionally, a presentation was provided to the Senate by Ann Haugo,
Theatre Faculty Member, on Native American student recruitment and retention
issues. Susan Kalter’s
e-mail communication regarding concerns about Native American recruitment
and retention (Document 10.16.06.01) and her recommendations for
improving the Native-American student experience at ISU (Document 12.18.07.01) were distributed
to the Senate as reference documents for the presentations. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
07.30.07.01-Item A/B
and UCC Guidelines |
Major/Minor Program Deletions – General
Recommendations |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
From Susan Kalter, 2006-07 Chairperson of the
Administrative Affairs and Budget Committee, 2-Part E-Mail Memo (Noted as
Item A and B below): Oral communication to the Executive Committee on 8/20/07.
Forwarded to both the Academic Affairs Committee and the Administrative
Affairs and Budget Committee. Item A: Prof.
Kalter’s e-mail recommended examining the rules for deleting minors because
of the proposed deletion of the Ethnic and Cultural Studies Minor (Document
04.04.07.01/Not Enclosed) without consultation with the faculty members
participating in this minor. The Executive Committee discussed the issue on
8/20/07 and recommended that the Academic Affairs Committee also look at the
rules for eliminating majors, as the rules were the same for both minors and
majors. This information was
referred to the 2007-08 Academic Affairs Committee. UCC Guidelines:
Following the 8/20/07 Exec Committee discussion, the Executive Committee
also examined the sections of the University Curriculum Committee Guidelines
concerning majors and minors. Those guidelines, which were last approved by
the Senate on 10/27/04, were also forwarded to the Academic Affairs
Committee for review/revision. Item B: Prof.
Kalter’s e-mail also contained information about a Parking Board meeting. This information was referred to the
2007-08 Administrative Affairs and Budget Committee. Update: No
action on this item was reported by committee during 2007-08 academic year. |
|||||
|
08.22.07.01 |
Major/Minor Program Deletions – Specific
Recommendations |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Professor Kalter submitted specific recommendations to
the UCC for changes to its guidelines (Course and Program Proposal
Preparation Packet) for “New, Revised or Deleted Program Instructions.”
Senator Kalter’s recommendations were forwarded directly to the UCC. Since
there has been no report from the UCC on these recommendations, they are
being forwarded to the 2008-09 Academic Affairs Committee. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
07.27.07.04 |
Term Paper Sale or Solicitation Policy – Policy on
Review Cycle |
Pending |
|
|
|
|
NOTES:
Policy on review cycle. Discussed by Executive Committee on 8/20/07.
Forwarded to 2007-08 Academic Affairs Committee in August 2007. Update: No
action on this item was reported by committee during 2007-08 academic year. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
07.27.07.06 |
Proficiency Exam Policy for Undergraduates – Policy on
Review Cycle |
Pending |
|
|
|
|
NOTES: Policy
on review cycle. Discussed by Executive Committee on 8/20/07. Forwarded to 2007-08
Academic Affairs Committee in August 2007. Update: No
action on this item was reported by committee during 2007-08 academic year. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
07.27.07.07 |
Withdrawal from Course Policy – Policy on Review Cycle |
Pending |
|
|
|
|
Policy on review
cycle. Discussed by Executive Committee on 8/20/07. Forwarded to 2007-08
Academic Affairs Committee in August 2007. Update: No
action on this item was reported by committee during 2007-08 academic year. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
02.11.08.01 |
General
Education Review: E-Mail Communication |
Completed/Not
Dist. To 08-09 Acad. Affairs Committee |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
From Frank Waterstraat/Academic Affairs Committee: E-Mail
Communication in Support of Artifact Portfolio for General Education Program
Review. Executive Committee Oral Communication on 2/11/08. The Executive
Committee requested that the Academic Affairs Committee prepare a Sense of
the Senate Resolution in support of the General Education Program review
method for the Senate’s consideration. |
|||||
|
02.21.08.02 |
General
Education Review: Sense of Senate Resolution
- Draft 1 |
Completed/Not
Dist. To 08-09 Acad. Affairs Committee |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
From Frank Waterstraat/Academic Affairs Committee: The Sense of the
Senate Resolution in Support of the Institutional Artifact Portfolio for the
General Education Program Review was prepared by the 2007-08 Academic
Affairs Committee. Resolution was distributed to the Executive Committee on
3/17/08. Executive Committee referred the resolution back to the AAC so that
all committee members might have input. |
|||||
|
03.12.08.01 |
General
Education Review: Sense of Senate Resolution
- Draft 2 |
Completed/Not
Dist. To 08-09 Acad. Affairs Committee |
NA |
NA |
Senate
Communication/ Endorsement on 3/26/08 |
|
From Frank Waterstraat/Academic Affairs Committee: On 3/17/08, the
Executive Committee reviewed the second draft of the Sense of the Senate
Resolution in Support of the Institutional Artifact Portfolio for the General
Education Program Review from the Academic Affairs Committee. The Executive
Committee made minor editorial revisions. Draft 2, as revised by the
Executive Committee, was endorsed by the Senate on 3/26/08. |
|||||
|
07.21.08.01 |
General
Education: CGE Report and Course Proposal Packet |
Pending |
|
|
|
|
From Sally Parry, Provost’s Designee for Council on General Education:
(1) Council on General Education 2007-08 Report; (2) Course Proposal
Preparation Packet. Executive Committee discussed on 8/18/08. Forwarded to
2008-09 Academic Affairs Committee for review. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
04.14.08.02 |
Ten-Year
Limit on Prerequisite Courses: Sense of the Senate Resolution |
Pending |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
From Frank Waterstraat/2007-08 Academic Affairs Committee: Proposed
Sense of the Senate Resolution for a Ten-Year Limit on Prerequisite Courses.
The resolution proposed to limit the time to time years for which a course
could count as credit as a prerequisite. On 4/14/08, the Executive Committee
returned the resolution to the Academic Affairs Committee. The Executive
Committee requested that the AAC present specific policy for consideration,
along with the Academic Affairs Committee’s recommendations for revisions to
that policy. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
09.10.07.01 |
|
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
09.28.07.01 |
Dress
Code - Marketing Department: Student Concern (From John Wilson, EAF Grad
Student) |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
10.02.07.03 |
Dress
Code - Marketing Department: Letter and Policies on Marketing Dept. Website |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
10.02.07.04 |
Dress
Code - Marketing Department: Response from SGA |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
04.18.08.06 |
Dress
Code - Marketing Department: Request from SGA to Senate for Further
Investigate the Merits of Dress Code Policy |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
09.04.08.01 |
Dress
Code - Marketing Department: Student Feedback Gathered by SGA Senator Mari
Ruscitti |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
The requirement of a dress code was first discussed by the Executive
Committee on 10/1/07. However, 2007-08 Student Body President Dave Horstein
asked that the item be temporarily tabled until the negotiations between SGA
and the Marketing Department Chairperson, Dr. Longfellow, were concluded.
Negotiations were not successful by the end of the 2007-08 school year.
Therefore, on 4/28/08, Student Body President for 2008-09, Ted Mason, asked
the Executive Committee to refer the matter to the Academic Affairs
Committee to “explore the merit of the dress code and the necessity and
validity it has to the educational enhancement of the University.” At the beginning of the fall semester, student leaders felt that the
issue of a dress code may no longer be a concern since there were fewer
complaints heard from students. On 8/18/08, the Executive Committee asked
SGA to investigate further before asking the Executive Committee to remove
the item from its agenda. On 9/3/08, Student Senator Mari Ruscitti reported
that the majority of students in the Marketing Department were in favor of a
dress code. However, the issue of the cost of professional dress was still
one of the major complaints. On 9/3/08, the Executive Committee recommended that the issue be
referred to the Academic Affairs Committee to further investigate the
ramifications of the imposition of a professional dress code for Marketing Department
students. Students are required to dress in business attire each day they
are in attendance in a Marketing Department class. At total of
not more than 10% may be deducted from a student’s grade for not adhering to
the professional dress code. This, of course, could be a determining factor
in whether or not a student is able to successfully pass a Marketing
Department course. |
|||||
|
08.29.08.01 |
Advisors
Assessment Committee Formation Recommendation |
Pending |
|
|
NA |
|
Student Body President Ted Mason proposed the formation of a
committee to assess the performance of academic advisors. He reported to the
Executive Committee on 9/3/08 the feedback he had received from students
about advisors placing students in unnecessary classes and thus delaying
graduation, as well as other inaccuracies. The Executive Committee suggested
that there may already be a committee which assesses the academic advisors.
Such a committee, if already in operation, would be under the auspices of
Jonathan Rosenthal/Enrollment Management and Academic Services. Senator
Mason asks for the Academic Affairs Committee to provide the Senate with a
report from the committee and asks that J. Rosenthal or a member of the
committee provide a presentation to the full Senate. |
|||||
|
09.08.08.01 |
Statement on D | ||||