ACADEMIC SENATE MINUTES
(Approved)
May 2, 2001
Volume
XXXII, No. 15
Call
to Order
Vice Chairperson Scott Kording called the meeting to
order at 7:00 p.m.
Seating of New
Senators
Joe
Armstrong, BSC
Harry Deutsch, Philosophy (2001-2003)
John
Pryor, Psychology
Ray
Clemens, History (2001-2002)
Ken
Lindblom, English
Khalid
Razaki, ACC
College
of Applied Science & Technology
Jim
Coliz, ACS
Kerry
Tudor, AG
Susan
Winchip, FCS
Maribeth
Lartz, SED
Thomas
Crumpler, C&I
Paul Borg, Music
The
following students were elected to the Senate for the term 2001-2002.
STUDENT BODY/SGA PRESIDENT
Scott
Kording
ON CAMPUS STUDENTS
Carolyn
Bathauer
Adam
Corelli
Michelle
Hines
La'Rufus
Mitchell
Mia
Porter
OFF
CAMPUS STUDENTS
Mark
Albrecht
Kenneth
Burger
Emily
Hoerr
Kieran
Kellam
Ryan
McNaught
Marques
Pitre
Ryan
Sass
Aisha
Strickland
Adele
Wheeler
Gabe
Wright
UNDERREPRESENTED STUDENTS
(Appointed by Student Body
President)
LaToya Trask
Ericca Pollack, Grad
Student
Sam Snyder, Grad Student
Melissa Francis
Dan Orlando
STUDENT
TRUSTEE
Cori Brown
Also joining the Senate
for the first time as ex-officio members were the Associate Vice President of
Graduate Studies, Research and International Studies, Dr. Gary McGinnis,
Associate Vice President of Undergraduate Studies, Dr. Eric Thomas, a
representative of the Deans Council, Dr. Robert Rossman and Chairperson of the
Chairpersons' Council, Dr. John Freed. The Chairperson of the Civil Service Council,
Christa Lawhun, and the Chairperson of the Administrative Professional Council,
Mike Baum, joined the Senate as voting members. The non-tenure track faculty
representative has yet to be appointed to the Senate.
Roll Call
Senator
Crothers called the roll and declared a quorum.
Election of Officers (Senate Chairperson, Secretary)
Motion
XXXII-131: by Senator Kording,
second by Senator Razaki, to elect the nominees for the office of Senate
Chairperson and Senate Secretary. The Senate unanimously elected Senator Curt
White as chairperson and Senator Lane Crothers as secretary.
Election of Executive Committee Members
The
Senate unanimously elected the following Senate members to the Executive
Committee of the Senate:
FACULTY
MEMBERS
Khalid Razaki
Eileen Fowles
Susan Winchip
John Walker
STUDENT MEMBERS
Mark Albrecht
la'Rufus Mitchell
Carolyn Bathauer
The President of the University, Senate
Chairperson, Senate Secretary and Student Body President are also members of
the Executive Committee.
Election to Foundation Board
The Senate unanimously
elected Senator Khalid Razaki for a three-year term (2001-2004) as the Senate
representative on the ISU Foundation Board.
Election to Campus
Communications Committee
Senator Razaki was unanimously elected by the Senate
for a two-year term (2001-2003) on the Campus Communications Committee.
Election to Council for Teacher Education
The
Senate unanimously elected Senator Vicky Morgan as the Senate representative on
the Council for Teacher Education for a three-year term (2001-2004).
Approval of Minutes of April 18, 2001
Motion XXXII-132: by
Senator Chang, second by Senator Fowles, to approve the Senate minutes of April
18, 2001. The minutes were unanimously approved.
Campus Master Plan Overview: Richard Runner, Director of Facilities
Planning
Richard
Runner: We update the Campus
Master Plan about every five years. The 14-member Master Plan Steering
Committee includes representatives from each of the vice presidential areas and
representatives from the President's office. Curt White is also a member of
that committee representing the Academic Senate.
Everything
that we do in the Campus Master Plan ties into the values and concepts
identified in Educating
Illinois. One of the core issues
that has come out of Educating
Illinois that we believe
symbolizes what we want the campus to be is a university with large course
offerings and a small college campus feel. We have spent considerable time as a
steering team asking people what that means and how that translates into the
development of the campus.
An
overview of the plan is as follows:
After
the initial draft is completed this summer, it will put on a web site. We will
then come back to meet with a variety of campus groups in preparation for
meeting with the Board of Trustees at their October meeting. Our overall
timeframe for completion of the master planning process is by February 2002.
That is a brief overview of what we have been doing over the last six months.
Senator
Borg: I now represent the
department that is probably in more buildings than any other department on
campus. Have you considered creating a diagonal path from the pergola to the
new arts center so that we do not have to walk across the lawn anymore?
Mr.
Runner: We will be addressing
those academic programs that are in essentially substandard space or that are
spread across a number of facilities. We will be looking at ways to relocate
those departments.
Senator
Kurtz: I want to compliment you
on your presentation. Not only was it exceedingly clear, it was exceedingly
exciting as well. How far along are you in terms of developing time lines for
the various aspects of this plan?
Mr.
Runner: Our timeframe is for a 15
to 20-year planning horizon. So, when this Master Plan is finalized, some
things will be completed in the first five years, second five years, etc. It
will go into an implementation phase, very similar to what is happening with Educating Illinois where the recommendations are handed off to
implementation groups.
Senator
Pollack: Thank you for your
presentation. How is student input being gathered and utilized on this committee?
Mr.
Runner: The former student
trustee has been on the committee and now we will be looking for input from the
new student trustee. We have also gone out to approximately five student
groups, which include the Student Government Association and the Residence
Halls Association. We have also conducted two public forums that were
publicized in the Vidette and the ISU Report.
Senator
Pitre: Has the committee
considered placing certain landmarks on the quad so that certain student
organizations could feel more identified with the University?
Mr.
Runner: That is probably more
detail than would be included in the Master Plan. We have talked in a broad
sense about the need for landmarks or icons for the institution.
Senator
Wright: Have you considered
redesigning the quad so that it would be more accessible to individuals with
disabilities?
Mr.
Runner: We have talked at great
length about the value of the quad and the design and that is our identity at
this point. We have not talked about reconfiguring the terrain in a substantial
way.
Senator
Reid: If there were ways of
breaking up the quad somewhat so that you could have inner neighborhoods within
the quad, I think it would give the University a much more small-college
feeling.
Mr.
Runner: We certainly could look
at the potential to create spaces that are more on a human scale. What we have
looked at within the quad are community-seating areas that would not interrupt
the vista, but would be welcoming to gather at.
Senator
Wheeler: We were talking about
breaking the quad up into smaller spaces, but I say keep in mind that there are
benefits of having the large open space. People go out there and play Frisbee
and have picnics on the quad. It would be fine if there were a few small areas,
but it is nice to have the big open, grassy area.
Senator
Mitchell: If one had questions or
suggestions, how would they contact you?
Mr.
Runner: You can contact me by
phone (438-2143) or by email (rcrunne@ilstu.edu). I am at 302 Hovey Hall.
Senator
White: As there are no further
questions, we thank you for your presentation. I was the unofficial,
self-designated Senate representative on the Master Planning Committee this
year. Now that we have a Planning and Finance Committee, one of the first
things that the committee should do is determine who is going to be the
representative(s) from that body to serve on the committee.
Chairperson's
Remarks
Senator White: I want to congratulate two senators, Senators
Chang and El-Zanati, who received their citizenship papers today. I had a
meeting today with Thomas Hustoles, an attorney who specializes in educational
law. He is going to serve as a consultant on revising our ethics and grievance
and academic freedom documents and make sure that they work well with our ASPT documents
and the University constitution. He will create recommendations for the Rules
Committee over the summer and then bring them to the committee early in the
fall. As you can see, we are an enhanced body now and I think it would be
useful if we were all conscientious about letting the Senate office know when
you are going to be absent.
Vice Chairperson/Student Government Association President's Remarks
Senator
Kording: At
6:00 p.m. tonight, the student government held a special meeting and made
substantial revisions to the student fee review process. In addition, we
succeeded in ensuring that we had at least one student senator representing the
six academic colleges with the appointment of the 20th SGA senator
tonight.
Administrators' Remarks:
·
President Vic Boschini: In the
last Senate, members asked that we regularly report on the comprehensive
campaign. I have recently received written confirmation of a gift in excess of
2½ million dollars. We will receive a portion of the funding up front because the
donor is very eager to establish an endowed chair now. The Provost is working
on the details relative to the establishment of that chair and we will bring
you that information as soon as possible. Tomorrow at 7:30 a.m., we will have
our Legislative Breakfast in Springfield. We invite legislators and other
decision makers to this annual breakfast. The next Board of Trustees' meeting
is Friday, May 11, at 8:00 a.m. in the Bone Student Center. They will have the
discussion hour at 8:00 a.m. and the meeting begins at 9:00 a.m.
·
Provost Al Goldfarb: The Budget Committee made a recommendation to
me about the Academic Impact Fund in terms of increasing instructional capacity
dollars for non-tenure track faculty to $28,800. I am pleased to announce that
we are going to actually go to $29,000. I have been meeting with the Illinois
Board of Higher Education to deal with issues of non-tenure track faculty and
part-time faculty around the state. We are in the midst of developing a survey
to discover what kind of policies and procedures exist on campuses. Illinois
State is well ahead of this process and I want to thank Senator El-Zanati for
allowing me to share, for example, the survey we did with our department chairs
on this issue. Jan Shane has been
appointed Assistant to the Provost. She will begin July 1. Dean Paul Schollaert
will be leaving ISU to serve as Provost at Eastern Michigan University. I have,
therefore, requested from the faculty and staff in the College of Arts and
Sciences names of either nominees or volunteers who might be willing to serve
for one year as acting dean as we began to put into place the process for
hiring a permanent replacement.
·
Vice President of Student Affairs: Excused Absence
·
Vice President of Finance and Planning:
Senator Bragg: The President, the Provost and I testified before
the House Appropriations Committee on April 26. We had previously testified
before the Senate Appropriations Committee about a month earlier. That hearing
went very well. Our staff is working diligently with Springfield on budget
appropriations. We are hopeful that the appropriation for Schroeder Hall will
come this year.
IBHE-FAC Report
Senator Crothers: For
those of you who do not know, I serve on the Faculty Advisory Committee, a
subcommittee of the Illinois Board of Higher Education. All of higher education
in Illinois is technically governed by this one central board. On the Faculty
Advisory Committee, the twelve Illinois public universities are permanently
represented. A portion of the community college campuses is represented on a
rotating basis as are the private universities. The Faculty Advisory Committee
meets once a month. At our last meeting, the primary topic was assessment. I
did have a thought that I wanted to share with those people engaged in
assessment issues and that is many of the current assessment procedures turn
out to be just one more thing on the backs of faculty. I think as we develop
these questions of assessment, it is important to keep that consideration in
mind and try to make them as faculty friendly and as faculty useful as
possible. I say this particularly in light of coming shortages nationwide of
faculty and difficulties in recruiting young faculty.
Senator Crothers' entire report can be found
on the Senate web site at: http://www.academicsenate.ilstu.edu.
Click "Committee Sites" and go to the IBHE section on that page.
Information Items:
03.26.01.03
Request for Name Change and School Status
for HPER (Former Administrative Affairs and Budget Committees)
Senator Kurtz: We
received a proposal for a name change and school status from the Health,
Physical Education and Recreation Department. HPER is requesting to change its
name to the School of Kinesiology and Recreation. The Administrative Affairs
Committee had no objections to the proposal.
Senator Razaki: I
do not understand the need for school designation. How many departments such as
HPER have school designations?
Professor Lacy, HPER Chairperson: There
are approximately 20 to 25 schools in our discipline. The University of
Illinois, to my knowledge, does not have one. That was part of our rationale
for wanting to do this given that we thought it would provide a recruiting
advantage and would provide distinctiveness for our department.
Senator Armstrong: These
kinds of changes may sound innocuous, but they can open the floodgate and set a
precedent for a number of other changes. While it may be understood to us that
a school is actually a department, it might be confusing after awhile.
Senator Landau: I
have been reacting in the same way as Senator Armstrong with all similar
requests for school status. Under what conditions might the Provost oppose such
a request or what criteria exists to help him respond favorably to such a
request? Also, I continue to be concerned about the implications for future
budgetary requests. An academic unit that enjoys school status may make a more
compelling request than a unit with department status. I have raised these
issues each time a request such as this has been made.
Senator Goldfarb: As
I indicated when we approved the school policy last year, things I would look
at are: the national norms in the discipline, what the issues are for the
department, how it ranks in stature nationally, would the department be
affected in terms of its ability to recruit and what kind of stature might it
bring back to the overall institution. Those were outlined in the original
school document that was passed by the Administrative Affairs Committee, Budget
Committee and Senate. Like many things, it is a judgment call of what would be
best for the program. In terms of budget requests, again, my response is that
the budget process stays in place within a college.
Senator Walker: Could
you give us a profile of a department that should be called a school in terms
of complexity and size?
Professor Lacy: Indiana
State University has the School of Health and Human Performance, which has four
departments. Our programs here in recreation are even broader than those at
Indiana State. Our sequences in physical education all have in excess of 125
majors in each of them, some as many as 250.
Senator Reid: Are you thinking
of dividing yourself into departments once you become a school; and to Senator
Goldfarb, is that an option?
Professor Lacy: I
have given no thought to that and it is my understanding that that is not an
option. I will say that whether we become a school or remain a department, I do
expect that the three primary sequences under the physical education program
will come forward to request that they become stand-alone majors. That will
happen whether we are a department or school.
Senator Goldfarb: Becoming
a school with separate departments is not an option. Any changes in majors will
have to go through the curricular process.
Senator Kurtz: The
Administrative Affairs Committee took at its word the document passed by the
Senate last semester that departments given school status were still to operate
as departments with no budgetary implications. I, however, would like to see
these questions filtered in some way through a master planning process so that
there could be some discussion about what the implications are for ISU having
so many departments achieving school status.
Senator Goldfarb: This
might be a good project for the new Planning and Finance Committee.
Senator Kurtz: It
also might be fruitful to bring together the Planning and Finance Committee
with an Educating Illinois implementation team. This might be an
opportunity to bring together shared governance and the academic planning of
the institution.
Senator Pollack: What
benefits are there for students if the department becomes a school?
Professor Lacy: I
do not think it is going to change the way we operate internally. We will
continue to try to offer the best programs we can regardless of what our name
is. It might be advantageous in recruiting students.
11.28.00.04 Term Paper Sales Policy Review (Former
Faculty Affairs and Student Affairs Committees)
Senator Thomas: There
were three basic changes to the policy. The first was to update the appropriate
Illinois statute. Additionally, under item #1, "administrative
professional" was not included in the previous policy so that was added.
The third change was to include in the footnote "electronic format",
which is now very common but was not in the previous policy.
Senator Deutsch: Does
the supporting statute for this policy preclude the students from purchasing
term papers as opposed to only selling them?
Senator Boschini: As
I recall, the statute prohibits you from selling them, not from purchasing
them.
Senator Borg: Can we prevent
the purchase under the Student Code of Conduct?
Senator McNaught: Could
we just add to the policy "the sale or purchase" of term papers?
Senator Howard: I
believe the purchase is addressed in Academic Integrity as well as in the Code
of Conduct.
Senator Goldfarb: I
will ask Senator Mamarchev to find out if the Student Code of Conduct prohibits
the purchase and then report back on that.